Ciencias,UNAM

harvesting grasshoppers sphenarium purpurascens in mexico for human consumption: a comparison with insecticidal control for managing pest outbreaks

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cerritos, R
dc.contributor.author Cano-Santana, Zenón
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-22T10:26:10Z
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-22T10:26:10Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-22T10:26:10Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-22T10:26:10Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.issn 0261-2194
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11154/1005
dc.description.abstract Predominant crops (corn, bean and alfalfa) in the Puebla-Tlaxcala Valley are routinely attacked by the grasshopper Sphenarium purpurascens (Orthoptera: Pyrgomophidae). The traditional method for managing this pest in Mexico has been the application of organophosphorus insecticides such as malathion. Inhabitants from Central Mexico also capture the grasshoppers for sale as food. In this study, we compared the capture of grasshoppers for human consumption to the conventional application of insecticides as a pest management strategy. The number of oothecae (egg pod), eggs, eggs per ootheca and the reproductive rate (Ro) were estimated over 2 years of the study. Counts were made on the edge and inner part of nine alfalfa plots. Egg density was found to be significantly affected by control tactic, with control > manual harvest > insecticide application. Egg density at the edge of farming plots was 14.9 times higher than within a plot. Ros ranged from 1.74 to 4.88 in the control, from 0.21 to 0.98 in the plots under manual harvest and from 0.38 to 0.77 in the plots under insecticide application. Similar results were found comparing oothecae densities. A mean of 39.5 eggs/ootheca was found, which constitutes the highest recorded value for this species. This research shows that manual harvest reduces the density of S. purpurascens and suggests that implementation of this mechanical method of control may be substituted for chemical control. Mechanical control provides general advantages: (1) a second profitable product for the human community en_US
dc.description.abstract (2) savings realized from reduced cost of insecticides en_US
dc.description.abstract and (3) reduced risk of soil and water contamination by insecticides. We propose that the manual harvest of insects is a practical method of pest control, which could be extensively applied in other crop systems in the world. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title harvesting grasshoppers sphenarium purpurascens in mexico for human consumption: a comparison with insecticidal control for managing pest outbreaks en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.idprometeo 946
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.08.001
dc.source.novolpages 27(40607):473-480
dc.subject.wos Agronomy
dc.description.index WoS: SCI, SSCI o AHCI
dc.subject.keywords Sphenarium purpurascens
dc.subject.keywords pest management
dc.subject.keywords pest control
dc.subject.keywords grasshopper control
dc.subject.keywords edible insect
dc.subject.keywords ootheca density
dc.relation.journal Crop Protection

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account