Ciencias,UNAM

NALC/Mexico land-cover mapping results: implications for assessing landscape condition

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lunetta, RS
dc.contributor.author Alvarez, R
dc.contributor.author Edmonds, CM
dc.contributor.author Lyon, JG
dc.contributor.author Elvidge, CD
dc.contributor.author Bonifaz, R
dc.contributor.author García, C
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-22T10:26:54Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-22T10:26:54Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.issn 0143-1161
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11154/1844
dc.description.abstract An inventory of land-cover conditions throughout Mexico was performed using North American Landscape Characterization ( NALC) Landsat Multi-Spectral Scanner (MSS) 'triplicate' images, corresponding to the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s epoch periods. The equivalent of 300 image scenes were analysed using an unsupervised classification approach by a consortium of 13 universities and institutes across Mexico. Accuracy assessments were conducted to validate the 1970s and 1990s results using independent land-cover classifications (reference data) developed from the interpretation of 1: 100 000-scale aerial photography collected in 1973, and Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery collected between 1990 and 1993. The 1980s epoch classifications were compared with both reference datasets, collectively. The relative accuracy of the classifications results were 60% for both the 1970s and 1990s epoch and 67% for the 1980s epoch. The significantly ( p= 0.05) higher accuracy for the 1980s epoch ( 67%) was thought to be an aberration resulting from the combined application of two reference datasets, resulting in a random compensation of reference data error. Significantly different ( p= 0.05) results were documented for a subset of Mexico's major habitat regions. Desert and xeric shrublands were most accurate (74%), followed by conifer and xeric dominated habitats (64%) and other mixed habitats (54%). Scenes representing the highest accuracies ( 15 percentile) almost exclusively represented desert and xeric shrub habitat regions, and the lowest (17 percentile) represented predominantly mixed habitat regions. Significant differences among the 13 member consortium universities and institutes were attributed to habitat region assignments. Results indicated that large area spectral based land-cover categorizations should be stratified and processed on a habitat or ecoregion basis. Results also suggested that any future land-cover conversion analysis for Mexico would probably best be accomplished using a post-classification approach, based on major habitat regions, rather than on a scene-by-scene or pixel-wise basis. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title NALC/Mexico land-cover mapping results: implications for assessing landscape condition en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.idprometeo 2164
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/01431160110071888
dc.source.novolpages 23(16):3129-3148
dc.subject.wos Remote Sensing
dc.subject.wos Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
dc.description.index WoS: SCI, SSCI o AHCI
dc.relation.journal International Journal of Remote Sensing

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account