Ciencias,UNAM

ultrastructure of tarsal sensilla and other integument structures of two pseudocellus species (ricinulei, arachnida)

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Talarico, G
dc.contributor.author Silva, MF
dc.contributor.author Alberti, G
dc.contributor.author Palacios-Vargas, JG
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-22T10:27:13Z
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-22T10:27:13Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-22T10:27:13Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-22T10:27:13Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.identifier.issn 0362-2525
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11154/2349
dc.description.abstract Ricinuleids are one of the least investigated groups of Arachnida. In particular, knowledge of their ultrastructure is poor. Observations of the distal tarsomeres of ricinuleids show differences in their shape and equipment of surface structures. Legs I and II are used by the Ricinulei to explore their surroundings with tentative movements. The tarsomeres of these legs show similarities in shape and surface structures that distinguish them from those of legs III and IV. In this study, 11 different structures of the tarsomere surfaces of two cave-dwelling species, Pseudocellus pearsei and P. boneti from Mexico, were investigated for the first time with scanning and transmission electron microscopy and discussed regarding their possible function: 1) a single treelike ramifying seta resembles a no pore single-walled (np-sw) sensillum en_US
dc.description.abstract 2) setae occurring in a small number and possessing a bipartite shaft represent terminal pore single-walled (tp-sw) sensilla. The surface of the proximal half of the shaft shows small branches. The distal half has a smooth surface en_US
dc.description.abstract 3) long setae with conspicuous longitudinal lamellae show characteristics of chemoreceptive wall pore single-walled (wp-sw) sensilla en_US
dc.description.abstract 4) frequent small wp-sw sensilla with flat and irregular lamellae en_US
dc.description.abstract 5) very short wp-sw sensilla occurring solitary or in groups en_US
dc.description.abstract 6) a few short setae with smooth surface correspond to wp-sw sensilla en_US
dc.description.abstract 7) a single short clubbed seta articulating in a flat pit is considered to be a np-sw sensillum en_US
dc.description.abstract 8) common long setae with a pointed tip show characteristics of mechanoreceptive np-sw sensilla en_US
dc.description.abstract 9) ventral setae with adhesive and mechanosensory function are accompanied by multicellular "class III" glands en_US
dc.description.abstract 10) slit organs with mechanoreceptive function en_US
dc.description.abstract and 11) dome-like tubercles with no indication of sensorial function. Several of these sensilla form a sensory field on the dorsofrontal surface which is particularly pronounced on the distal tarsomeres of legs I and II. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title ultrastructure of tarsal sensilla and other integument structures of two pseudocellus species (ricinulei, arachnida) en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.idprometeo 1443
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/jmor.10415
dc.source.novolpages 267(4):441-463
dc.subject.wos Anatomy & Morphology
dc.description.index WoS: SCI, SSCI o AHCI
dc.subject.keywords Ricinulei
dc.subject.keywords tarsi
dc.subject.keywords sensilla
dc.subject.keywords ultrastructure
dc.relation.journal Journal of Morphology

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account