Ciencias,UNAM

evaluation of the antinociceptive effect of rosmarinus officinalis l. using three different experimental models in rodents

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pena, EI
dc.contributor.author Martínez, AL
dc.contributor.author Moreno, J
dc.contributor.author Deciga-Campos, M
dc.contributor.author López-Muñoz, FJ
dc.contributor.author González-Trujano, ME
dc.contributor.author Guevara, P
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-22T10:26:17Z
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-22T10:26:17Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-22T10:26:17Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-22T10:26:17Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.issn 0378-8741
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11154/3176
dc.description.abstract The rationale of this investigation was to examine the antinociceptive effect of an ethanol extract of Rosmarinus officinalis (RO) aerial parts, using three different experimental models: acetic acid-induced writhing test and formalin test in mice en_US
dc.description.abstract and a model of arthritic pain: "pain-induced functional impairment model in the rat (PIFIR model)". The antinociceptive efficacies were evaluated using several dose-response curves and time courses. The antinociceptive effects from RO extract were compared with the antinociceptive effect of either tramadol (TR: 3.16-50 mg/kg, i.p. in mice, and 1.0-31.62 mg/kg, i.p. in rats) or acetylsalicylic acid (AA: 31.62-562.32 mg/kg, p.o.). RO extract (10-300 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly (P < 0.001) reduced the number of writhing movement induced by the i.p. administration of acetic acid solution in a dose-dependent way (ED50 =108.84 mg/kg, whereas, TR showed an ED50 =12.38 mg/kg). In addition, RO extract (30-300 mg/kg) significantly (P < 0.001) inhibited licking and shaking behaviours in both early (neurogenic pain) and in the late (inflammatory pain) phases of the formalin test. These effects were like those produced by TR. Concerning the results using the PIFIR model, RO extract (30-3000 mg/kg, p.o.) like either TR or AA, produced a significant (P < 0.001) and dose-dependent antinociceptive response in rats (RO: ED50 = 222.78 mg/kg versus TR: ED50 = 11.06 mg/kg and AA: ED50 = 206.13 mg/kg). These results strongly suggest that aerial parts of RO possess antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activity, and reinforce the use of this plant in folk medicine. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title evaluation of the antinociceptive effect of rosmarinus officinalis l. using three different experimental models in rodents en_US
dc.type Artículo de investigación en_US
dc.identifier.idprometeo 1172
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jep.2006.12.011
dc.source.novolpages 111(3):476-482
dc.subject.wos Plant Sciences
dc.subject.wos Chemistry, Medicinal
dc.subject.wos Integrative & Complementary Medicine
dc.subject.wos Pharmacology & Pharmacy
dc.description.index WoS: SCI, SSCI o AHCI
dc.subject.keywords antinociception
dc.subject.keywords formalin test
dc.subject.keywords PIFIR model
dc.subject.keywords writhing
dc.subject.keywords Rosmarinus officinalis
dc.subject.keywords traditional medicine
dc.relation.journal Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account